Archive for November, 2006

h1

Stopping Comment Spam

Tuesday, November 28th, 2006

Comment spam has been getting relatively out of control with 20 to 30 spam posts every day. To prevent this I now require people to register and log in to comment. Registration is currently open, so all you have to do is use the registration function and you can comment.

We’ll see how it works.

h1

f10 Imaging

Saturday, November 25th, 2006

Several weeks ago, I finally set up my C-11 OTA, TCF focuser, Pyxis field rotator, AO-7 and ST-10 for imaging at f10. That’s 2880mm with only .5 arc seconds per pixel unbinned on the ST-10. Let’s just say that results were mixed. I’ll admit that seeing wasn’t great, but I don’t think I’ll try this again.

There are some good things about imaging at f10.

  • The AO-7 guides very well. Round stars, no wandering, very nice even at this long focal length.
  • Objects are large with good magnifications (if only they were clear — see below)
  • I could use the Pyxis field rotator with my C-11

But the negatives outweighed the positives.

  • Finding objects was hard. Where a sub-second focus exposre 3x binned would find an object at f6, 1 or more seconds was required for each finding and framing exposure.
  • It was murder trying to get to focus. FocusMax struggled because seeing changed overwhelmed focus changes.
  • It was impossible to find a guide star. With the AstroDon Clear filter, it was a struggle to find a star bright enough to guide at 1-2hz with the AO-7, minimum (in my mind) for decent results at f10.
  • So that was guide stars with the clear filter. Forget color. No object I tried had a guide star in blue that was usable. (Sidebar — NGC 891 – great guide star, available only at f6.)
  • No data. I felt as if I was imaging with an Ha filter. After 5 minutes, the object was hardly brighter than the backgound (100 ADU out of 3500)
  • Fuzzy results. The seeing errors overwhelmed the ability to resolve. All I got were high magnification, blurry results. It reminded me of when I try to use a high magnification eyepiece or a barlow, and, while the result is more magnified, it is not a better image to see or record.
  • It sure makes me wish I had a 20″ Richey Chretien. :-)

It only took a couple of years, but now I have learned that all of the advice about long focal length imaging is correct. It is really hard and, without great equipment (no, good won’t suffice), it will not produce adequate results.

Here is the result:

NGC 7331 @ f10

So f5.95 with an C-11 is OK, but f10 is not.

h1

A Good Night Viewing in Aguanga

Saturday, November 25th, 2006

On the day after Thanksgiving, my wife’s sister and brother-in-law came over to Aguanga for dinner. We had a nice afternoon and grilled hambugers (I am sitll getting used to the new three-burner grill).

After dinner, my brother-in-law and I took out my old 8″ Celestron SCT on a CG-5 mount to look at the stars. It was not a very transparent night. Contrary to local averages, the dew point was above 50 degrees F, and the when we went out, the temperature was 53 and falling quickly. We had taken the scope out before dinner, so when we went out, it was already covered with dew. Using a hair drier, we dried off the Telrad, and heated up both the corrector (with the cap on) and the objective. That was just the beginning of the dew but in the end the dew did not prevent a successful night of observing.

Our first target was M31, the Andromeda Galaxy. It is dark enough in Anguanga so that with either binoculars or a telescope, you can see the elongated shape and spiral nature of the galaxy. It is visible naked eye as well.

For visual observing, Celestron’s Sky Maps is actually very useful. It charts the constellations by season, and lists findable double stars and deep sky objects for each constellation. That book guided our observing for the evening, along with my rusty object finding skills.

Our second target was M15, the globular cluster in Pegasus. It was both easy to find and wonderful to see. That was followed by M2, another beautiful globular. Though they were low in the sky, we observed Albireo and M57, the Ring Nebula.

After the look at the southern sky, we moved north and west to the faboulous Double Cluster in Perseus. It is larger than the field of view of the C-8 with a 35mm plossl, but still beautiful. Then came, for me, the highlight of the night. I found M33, the Triangulum galaxy, on the chart. I didn’t think I could find it. I did find it. We could see the circular flow of the galaxy — it filled the FOV at 35mm.

Emboldended by finding M33, I saw M77 on the chart and decided to try and find it. This is where I failed at reading a chart and looking at the sky. I thought I found Cetus, and the circle where M77 lies. I searched for probably 15 minutes (at this point, the temperature had fallen into the 40s). I never found it. My problem was that I mistook the western portion of the constellation for the eastern portion. The picture below shows my mistake. I didn’t figure this out until after all the guests had left and I looked at a wider view star chart. That wider angle helped me see my mistake in location.

Click for full size

At that point, we were getting cold. So we looked at M42, the Nebula in Orion. It was clearly visible even though it was only 15 to 20 degrees above the horizon. Yielding to ego, I tried to find M1, the Crab Nebula. I am fairly confident I was looking in the right place, but I could not find it.

The major side bar to the night was the dew. We had to dry off the objective every 5-10 minutes. That is what goes with working below the dew point, I guess. I imagine that the objective needs cleaning. And I found both the 99% isopropyl alchohol and the distilled water to make lens cleaner. Altogether a great night of observing. Let us all never forget that even with our wonderful detectors.